A Darwinian understanding of culture begins with the observation that the arts appear in every human society and yield intense d

admin2015-06-24  49

问题     A Darwinian understanding of culture begins with the observation that the arts appear in every human society and yield intense delight. When evolutionary psychologists detect those qualities, bells start ringing. Universal appearance of a behavior, for example, walking upright, sometimes leads scientists to infer that it evolved before our ancestors’ diaspora from Africa 60,000 years ago. Andintense pleasure is often how our genes encourage some advantageous behavior.【F1】But where an upright manner of walking and a varied diet had obvious survival advantages for our forefathers, it’s far from clear that the same went for something as energy-consuming and apparently useless as the arts.
    Denis Dutton, the author of a new book about creativity and evolution, sees evolution generating an art instinct in two ways. First, creative capacities would have helped our ancestors to survive in the hostile conditions of the Pleistocene, the epoch beginning 1.8 million years ago, during which Homo sapiens evolved in Africa【F2】An ability to invent and absorb stories, for instance, would have helped early humans work out "what if" situations without risking their lives, pass along survival tips and build capacities for understanding other people around the campfire.The best storytellers and best listeners would have had slightly greater odds of survival, giving future generations a higher percentage of good storytellers and listeners, and so on.
   【F3】Second, on those long, dull nights after the day’s hunting and/or gathering was done, a big vocabulary and a creative characteristic would have improved a man’s chances of pursuing a lover—just as an amusing woman would have been more likely to entice the guy to stay. According to this view, which Dutton derives from the psychologist Geoffrey Miller, evolution turns the brain into "a gaudy, overpowered Pleistocene home-entertainment system" for winning and keeping lovers.
   【F4】Over the thousands of generations of our prehistory, then, the pressure from these two processes would have led to what Dutton calls the survival "not just of the physically strongest but of the cleverest, wittiest and wisest." By the dawn of civilization 10,000 years ago, our ancestors’ brains would have been hard-wired to collaborate and use tools, as well as to create and enjoy art. Thus our tastes are not blank slates filled in entirely by our societies:【F5】they are shaped in part by the distant ancestors whom we unknowingly take with us every time we go to the museum, the playhouse and the concert hall. All in all, it’s a lovely vision. I just wish somebody could convince me that it’s true.
【F4】

选项

答案基于这两种途径带来的压力,其结果便如达顿所说:史前千万代人里生存下来的“不仅仅是那些最强壮的,而且还有那些最伶俐、最机智、最聪慧的”。

解析 lead to后面的宾语太长,翻译时可以采用分译法,在lead to这里断句,并把动词词组lead to转化为名词“其结果是……”。句首的时间状语虽与lead to后的宾语相隔很远,但意义上的关联十分密切。因此在译文中应予以体现,“史前千万代人里生存下来的……”。这样处理意思更为连贯。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/2AFRFFFM
0

最新回复(0)